Lou Castle said:
Tim Martens said:
for those of you that work or train find and bark dogs, how do you handle felony car stop scenarios? you send the dog and he alerts on somebody in the car by barking, or do you send them in with the bite command?
Depends on the training. My dogs could be deployed with a command that had them either barking or biting. Usually for a car extraction, someone refusing to get out of the car, it was a bite. Are you talking about checking the car to see if anyone is in it before going up and clearing it by hand? If so then it was usually a bark.
yes. that is exactly the scenario i was talking about. for instance a stolen car. you do the high risk stop, pull the driver out, give the bluff announcement and then use the dog to clear the car prior to officers checking it. the way i look at it, it seems pointless to do a bark and hold in this situation. so your dog goes up and barks and you again order the guy out and he still doesn't come out, you're going to have the dog bite him anyway correct? and what if for some reason, the dog doesn't bark. what then? you're still going to have officers clear the car as if someone were still in there, but then they're going up there with the false sense of security that the dog cleared the car.
i know that it all boils down to training and that a dog trained in the B/H should bark at the guy, but we all know things can go awry for any number of different reasons.
as far as training the dog to go in and bite, it shouldn't make the B/H dirty in other areas if you
only train this for the car extraction. where i could see problems would be a search where the suspect is hiding in a car. the only way around that is to do many reps so the dog is strong in the association with the car extraction command (which should be different from the bite and search commands).
my agency is B/H and i was thinking about this the other day. we train, as you do lou, to do a B/H on the felony/high risk stop and it doesn't make a lot of sense to me for the reasons i stated...